Section 16.1 Rings
A nonempty set \(R\) is a ring if it has two closed binary operations, addition and multiplication, satisfying the following conditions.
\(a + b = b + a\) for \(a, b \in R\text{.}\)
\((a + b) + c = a + ( b + c)\) for \(a, b, c \in R\text{.}\)
There is an element \(0\) in \(R\) such that \(a + 0 = a\) for all \(a \in R\text{.}\)
For every element \(a \in R\text{,}\) there exists an element \(a\) in \(R\) such that \(a + (a) = 0\text{.}\)
\((ab) c = a ( b c)\) for \(a, b, c \in R\text{.}\)

For \(a, b, c \in R\text{,}\)
\begin{align*} a( b + c)&= ab +ac\\ (a + b)c & = ac + bc\text{.} \end{align*}
This last condition, the distributive axiom, relates the binary operations of addition and multiplication. Notice that the first four axioms simply require that a ring be an abelian group under addition, so we could also have defined a ring to be an abelian group \((R, +)\) together with a second binary operation satisfying the fifth and sixth conditions given above.
If there is an element \(1 \in R\) such that \(1 \neq 0\) and \(1a = a1 = a\) for each element \(a \in R\text{,}\) we say that \(R\) is a ring with unity or identity. A ring \(R\) for which \(ab = ba\) for all \(a, b\) in \(R\) is called a commutative ring. A commutative ring \(R\) with identity is called an integral domain if, for every \(a, b \in R\) such that \(ab = 0\text{,}\) either \(a = 0\) or \(b = 0\text{.}\) A division ring is a ring \(R\text{,}\) with an identity, in which every nonzero element in \(R\) is a unit; that is, for each \(a \in R\) with \(a \neq 0\text{,}\) there exists a unique element \(a^{1}\) such that \(a^{1} a = a a^{1} = 1\text{.}\) A commutative division ring is called a field. The relationship among rings, integral domains, division rings, and fields is shown in FigureĀ 16.1.
Example 16.2.
As we have mentioned previously, the integers form a ring. In fact, \({\mathbb Z}\) is an integral domain. Certainly if \(a b = 0\) for two integers \(a\) and \(b\text{,}\) either \(a=0\) or \(b=0\text{.}\) However, \({\mathbb Z}\) is not a field. There is no integer that is the multiplicative inverse of \(2\text{,}\) since \(1/2\) is not an integer. The only integers with multiplicative inverses are \(1\) and \(1\text{.}\)
Example 16.3.
Under the ordinary operations of addition and multiplication, all of the familiar number systems are rings: the rationals, \({\mathbb Q}\text{;}\) the real numbers, \({\mathbb R}\text{;}\) and the complex numbers, \({\mathbb C}\text{.}\) Each of these rings is a field.
Example 16.4.
We can define the product of two elements \(a\) and \(b\) in \({\mathbb Z}_n\) by \(ab \pmod{n}\text{.}\) For instance, in \({\mathbb Z}_{12}\text{,}\) \(5 \cdot 7 \equiv 11 \pmod{12}\text{.}\) This product makes the abelian group \({\mathbb Z}_n\) into a ring. Certainly \({\mathbb Z}_n\) is a commutative ring; however, it may fail to be an integral domain. If we consider \(3 \cdot 4 \equiv 0 \pmod{12}\) in \({\mathbb Z}_{12}\text{,}\) it is easy to see that a product of two nonzero elements in the ring can be equal to zero.
A nonzero element \(a\) in a commutative ring \(R\) is called a zero divisor if there is a nonzero element \(b\) in \(R\) such that \(ab = 0\text{.}\) In the previous example, \(3\) and \(4\) are zero divisors in \({\mathbb Z}_{12}\text{.}\)
Example 16.5.
In calculus the continuous realvalued functions on an interval \([a,b]\) form a commutative ring. We add or multiply two functions by adding or multiplying the values of the functions. If \(f(x) = x^2\) and \(g(x) = \cos x\text{,}\) then \((f+g)(x) = f(x) + g(x) = x^2 + \cos x\) and \((fg)(x) = f(x) g(x) = x^2 \cos x\text{.}\)
Example 16.6.
The \(2 \times 2\) matrices with entries in \({\mathbb R}\) form a ring under the usual operations of matrix addition and multiplication. This ring is noncommutative, since it is usually the case that \(AB \neq BA\text{.}\) Also, notice that we can have \(AB = 0\) when neither \(A\) nor \(B\) is zero.
Example 16.7.
For an example of a noncommutative division ring, let
where \(i^2 = 1\text{.}\) These elements satisfy the following relations:
Let \({\mathbb H}\) consist of elements of the form \(a + b {\mathbf i} + c {\mathbf j} +d {\mathbf k}\text{,}\) where \(a, b , c, d\) are real numbers. Equivalently, \({\mathbb H}\) can be considered to be the set of all \(2 \times 2\) matrices of the form
where \(\alpha = a + di\) and \(\beta = b + ci\) are complex numbers. We can define addition and multiplication on \({\mathbb H}\) either by the usual matrix operations or in terms of the generators \(1\text{,}\) \({\mathbf i}\text{,}\) \({\mathbf j}\text{,}\) and \({\mathbf k}\text{:}\)
and
where
Though multiplication looks complicated, it is actually a straightforward computation if we remember that we just add and multiply elements in \({\mathbb H}\) like polynomials and keep in mind the relationships between the generators \({\mathbf i}\text{,}\) \({\mathbf j}\text{,}\) and \({\mathbf k}\text{.}\) The ring \({\mathbb H}\) is called the ring of quaternions.
To show that the quaternions are a division ring, we must be able to find an inverse for each nonzero element. Notice that
This element can be zero only if \(a\text{,}\) \(b\text{,}\) \(c\text{,}\) and \(d\) are all zero. So if \(a + b {\mathbf i} + c {\mathbf j} +d {\mathbf k} \neq 0\text{,}\)
Proposition 16.8.
Let \(R\) be a ring with \(a, b \in R\text{.}\) Then
\(a0 = 0a = 0\text{;}\)
\(a(b) = (a)b = ab\text{;}\)
\((a)(b) =ab\text{.}\)
Proof.
To prove (1), observe that
hence, \(a0=0\text{.}\) Similarly, \(0a = 0\text{.}\) For (2), we have \(ab + a(b) = a(bb) = a0 = 0\text{;}\) consequently, \(ab = a(b)\text{.}\) Similarly, \(ab = (a)b\text{.}\) Part (3) follows directly from (2) since \((a)(b) = (a( b)) = (ab) = ab\text{.}\)
Just as we have subgroups of groups, we have an analogous class of substructures for rings. A subring \(S\) of a ring \(R\) is a subset \(S\) of \(R\) such that \(S\) is also a ring under the inherited operations from \(R\text{.}\)
Example 16.9.
The ring \(n {\mathbb Z}\) is a subring of \({\mathbb Z}\text{.}\) Notice that even though the original ring may have an identity, we do not require that its subring have an identity. We have the following chain of subrings:
The following proposition gives us some easy criteria for determining whether or not a subset of a ring is indeed a subring. (We will leave the proof of this proposition as an exercise.)
Proposition 16.10.
Let \(R\) be a ring and \(S\) a subset of \(R\text{.}\) Then \(S\) is a subring of \(R\) if and only if the following conditions are satisfied.
\(S \neq \emptyset\text{.}\)
\(rs \in S\) for all \(r, s \in S\text{.}\)
\(rs \in S\) for all \(r, s \in S\text{.}\)
Example 16.11.
Let \(R ={\mathbb M}_2( {\mathbb R} )\) be the ring of \(2 \times 2\) matrices with entries in \({\mathbb R}\text{.}\) If \(T\) is the set of upper triangular matrices in \(R\text{;}\) i.e.,
then \(T\) is a subring of \(R\text{.}\) If
are in \(T\text{,}\) then clearly \(AB\) is also in \(T\text{.}\) Also,
is in \(T\text{.}\)